‘Ammachi’ (ammache yemba nenapu) is a sahitya kamba award winner
short story of the prolific Kannada writer vaidehi. Vaidehi has been the second
pen name of the author Janaki
Srinivasa Murthy. Sudha was the pen name given in Kannada magazines though the
publishers were forced to change it into vaidehi as she disliked to get one of
her stories published in the magazine for it was a real life story. Meanwhile the
detailed information about the name and content of the story is not seen in her
biographical descriptions. Vaidehi was born on February. 1945 in kundapur taluk
of uduppi district, Karnataka. She has grown up in very large Brahmin family
and she speaks ‘kunadapur dialect’ of Kannada as she uses the same in her
writings.
In the story ‘Ammachi’ the author recollects a real life story of
her village friend that she came across in her childhood. The uniqueness of the
story is that the author is also one of the integral characters of the story. Among
the different interpretations came up in our discussion as to the theme of the
story, one was ‘it is a picturesque of a lady who struggle to run away from
rural-norms being attracted to urban trends. Ammachi seems to be walking against
the societal constructs that turned her to be ‘brat’ in the society. Being her
father died in early childhood, venkappaiya, a six year old boy’s, support
found demanded for her family. Later he started dictating ammachi in her do’s
and don’ts. It went even to torture her physically to bleed at times in the
story. Ammachi never liked him and his right on her whereas she expressed her
will to be with modern fashion and her likeness over sambatta’s cute son. It has
been seen all through her activities like of course in her personal characters
and her hair style which made her to be called ‘Bombay lady, and attempt to stich
back-button blouse seeing city girls don the kind. However she had to give in
before venkappaiya as he married her and took to thirupathi where he was
running business. Ammache returns back alone towards the end with news of venkappaiya’s
death which shocked her mother ‘seetatthe’. The story ends with a double
reaction of ammachi’s tears and happy flash the author found in her one corner
of eye. It ends up in putting readers in confusion over concluding whether it
was a tragedy or comedy.
In our discussion there were
different perspectives came up on different elements of the story. Mainly, the
part of the element ‘character’ subjected with more interpretation. Venkappaiya’s
and ammachi’s characters were of course found more debated over. Some came up
with justifying venkappaiya’s character saying that at most of the times
ammachi’s misbehaviour made the scene worst. On the other side some (including
me) had a strong stand questioning his right over ammachi in dictating the ways
and marrying her forcefully. There was other ideas arguing for the idea that
ammachi had a soft corner toward venkappaiya’s. They took all her words used
for mocking at him with her love over him and it has been reinforced taking the
fact that he never reacted harshly for any of her such words. we had to leave
the conclusion to different stands without consensus .We came to a kind of
conclusion in terms of the element ‘plot’ that the story can be split into two
plots, one ammachi’s moments with vaidehi and ammachi at home mostly with
venkappaiya.
I walked to the literary circle with just my idea of the story,
even unclear that, but it seemed like keep open up a lot of things throughout
the discussion. We tried starting off the discussion at one go but we had to do
a shared reading to go with that. One of us took the initiative of reading a page
by page and pauses at needy points and went discussing through every possible domain.
Time to time posted blogs of other groupies seemed added more openings and it
fuelled entire analysis.
For me the story the story found livelier like other members of the
group as the setting of the story is much to do with my own village setting. The
point of double-face of the rural- norms have kept flashing upon me throughout
the story. The same society that called her ‘brat’ for her character and shown
more care even to move other girls away from her touch seen allow a stranger
live with two shipwrecked women and exploit their weakness. It can be a story
of a lady who endeavored at possible cost for a change of women identity in
the society and lost the battle being there was no magic wand of education or
power. It reminds me of my past society who used to shower utmost accolades upon rich Muslim
girls doing education even after marriage on one hand and frowning upon poor girl even schooling after the marriage. This instance
lead us to the other side picture in ammachi’s case that is if she was with any
such power entire norms would go with the wind.
No comments:
Post a Comment